Compare

EmmauOS beside the other spiritual gifts tests and church tools

10 pages, each written the same way: what the other test or tool does, what EmmauOS does, where each is the better choice, and the questions churches ask before deciding. Prices and features come from each vendor's own pages, last checked October 20, 2026. EmmauOS is the newest tool on these pages, and they say plainly where it is ahead: the research behind every question is published, Planning Center syncs both ways on every paid plan, and an AI assistant can work your follow-up list while never scoring a person.

Where EmmauOS is ahead

As of October 20, 2026, from the vendors' own pages. A page that does not describe something may still offer it; these pages report what each vendor says.

  • Built on the research. Every design choice, from behavior statements to the ±2 margin, is on why we ask what we ask with the papers behind it. We did not find a research page on any other vendor's site.
  • Bands with the margin drawn. Every other result format we read is an order: top five, top three, dominant gift, a chart, a fit percentage. EmmauOS shows every gift within three points of the strongest together and never prints a rank.
  • Follow-up that checks itself. A result lands in the team's list with the person's words and consent and the serving teams that need those gifts, and 90 days after a placement EmmauOS asks whether it took. On Planning Center churches it looks at whether the person was actually scheduled.
  • Planning Center both ways, on every paid plan. Band names and the date out to fields you choose; teams in from Services and People. Two vendors charge their top tier for a one-way push.
  • AI that works for the team and never scores a person. Connect Claude or any assistant that speaks the Model Context Protocol to your follow-up list, let EmmauOS read your website and your bookshelf, and brief staff on your own key. Several vendors point their AI at rating people instead.
  • Promises to the people who take it, in writing. Never ranked, never shared without consent, never kept longer than you said, erasable by the member. Each promise names the switch that keeps it.

Head to head

One page per tool, with the same questions asked of each.

How these pages were made

  • Every price and feature was read from the vendor's own public pages on the date the page names. Nothing comes from a review site or a sales call.
  • When a vendor's page does not mention something, the page says "not shown on their pages", never "they don't have it".
  • Each page says plainly where the other test or tool is the better choice. Some churches should pick them.
  • Vendors change prices. If a page is out of date, write to [email protected] and it will be corrected and re-dated.

The quickest comparison is your own result

Take the assessment in 10–15 minutes and open the pastor's view in a demo church. If it fits, create your church and the first 50 people are free, with no card. Already using one of the tools above? Every head-to-head page ends with how to switch, and the two can run side by side while you decide.

Take the assessment Start your church free

Reading this with an AI assistant? The same pages are at compare/llms.txt, every page has a Markdown version with .md on the end of its address, and every feature named here is explained in the documentation.